NDA candidate Chakradhar Gogoi has raised concerns over alleged discrepancies in the age declared by Lurinjyoti Gogoi, president of the Assam Jatiya Parishad, in election affidavits filed over different years. He indicated that legal action may follow if any misrepresentation is established.
Allegations of Inconsistent Affidavit Details
Speaking on the issue, Chakradhar Gogoi claimed that Lurinjyoti Gogoi’s age has not remained consistent across election filings. According to him, the affidavit submitted during the 2021 Assam Assembly elections listed Lurinjyoti Gogoi’s age as 43.
In contrast, his affidavit for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections reportedly mentioned his age as 45. However, Gogoi alleged that in the latest affidavit for the 2026 elections, the age has been stated again as 43, rather than reflecting a natural increase.
He argued that such discrepancies raise questions about the accuracy and reliability of information provided in official election documents.
Official Position and Warning of Legal Action
Chakradhar Gogoi stated that if it is found that any details have been deliberately concealed or misrepresented, he would pursue legal remedies.
He emphasized that election affidavits are legally binding documents and that providing incorrect information could attract action under applicable laws governing electoral disclosures.
Why Affidavits Matter in Elections
Election affidavits are a key component of India’s electoral process. Candidates are required to disclose personal, financial, and criminal background details while filing nominations. These declarations are intended to ensure transparency and allow voters to make informed choices.
Any inconsistency in such disclosures can become a matter of scrutiny, particularly during closely contested elections.
Political Context
The development comes amid heightened political activity in Assam, where multiple parties, including the NDA and regional formations like the Assam Jatiya Parishad, are competing for electoral space.
Allegations between candidates are not uncommon during election periods, but claims involving official documents often attract closer attention from both the Election Commission and the public.
Public Impact and Next Steps
If the issue escalates, it could lead to legal scrutiny of the affidavits in question. Election authorities or courts may examine whether discrepancies are clerical errors or constitute deliberate misrepresentation.
For voters, the controversy underscores the importance of transparency in candidate disclosures and the role of accountability in the democratic process.
Conclusion
While the allegations remain to be formally verified, Chakradhar Gogoi’s remarks signal a potential legal and political dispute ahead. The matter is likely to develop further depending on responses from Lurinjyoti Gogoi and any subsequent action by authorities.
inputs and images : Hindustan samachar
Edited By D.Rishidhar Reddy
About The Author
